Yesterday evening at around 6pm I was doing what the majority of the nation do at that time on a Saturday evening, I was watching ITV. I absolutely love watching “The Chase” but what I hate is advert breaks that are longer than the snippets of the show in between them. Yesterday evening was slightly different as I don’t recall there being a break in “The Chase” at all, I have no idea why … perhaps ITV want to me more like BBC? perhaps the pre-recorded show was longer than intended so they cut breaks so the schedule ran smoothly? I don’t really care to be honest, I just want to rant about advertising in general.
It’s rather sad to think of how much of your life you have spent watching adverts, probably hours on end where you could have been doing something much more productive with your time such as reading a book or taking your four legged fury friend for a walk. Instead we just sit there watching a series of clips of “sexy” people advertising toasters (and other products) which they probably really don’t own. The level of celebrity influence is beyond despicable these days. X Factor rejects One Direction advertise Nintendo products, children then want said Nintendo products because One Direction apparently like to use such Nintendo products. Surprisingly this effect isn’t just apparent in the young and naive, we’ve all bought something because of celebrity influence at some point, whether that’s perfume, football boots or food from Iceland, their slogan is “Party like a Celeb” after all. It’s rather stereotypical to say “oh, well sex sells and that’s what sells products best” … this is actually my point, a negative point. All people who feature in adverts are stereotypically attractive, the kind of people who “normal” people would like to be similar to. We’re all more foolish than we thought as we then go out and buy these products in order to gain a similar life style.
You’re probably all sitting there thinking that I’m a bit nuts. You probably think that I’ve just demonstrated that the whole point of advertising is to sell a product and these are the best methods to use. Yes, I’ve researched the history of advertising and know quite a bit about media influence. If you know anything about advertising at all then you’ll know about a man called Walter Dil Scott who experimented with subliminal advertising in the 1950s. This is when advertising started to change into the type of advertising today, this is where advertising became based on influencing behaviour. Before Walter Dil Scott’s experimentation advertising was merely just posters with a picture of a product and a bit of information explaining what its purpose was, where you could get it from and how much it would cost. After subliminal advertising on TV and in cinemas was made illegal the advertising industry had to think of other ways to influence people and remain powerful in order to keep capitalism the way it had boomed. This sadly was celebrity influence and the “sex sells” approach.
I think it’s about time that I gave some examples of ways in which companies manage to influence, perhaps stories where changes have been made in order to make a product seem more appealing. A perfect example would be the recent Marks & Spencer Christmas advert. The advert features this years X Factor finalists singing “When you Wish upon A Star”, each time a contestant leaves the show (weekly) the advert is updated by removing the reject out of the video. What’s even worse is that I think this was sparked off by bad boy Frankie Cocozza being thrown out of the show for partying hard and taking cocaine. As you can imagine, Frankie got bad press and many newspapers reported that Cocozza spent the £3,000 that Marks & Spencer paid him to feature in their Christmas advert. Shortly after the bad press Marks & Spencer removed Cocozza from their advert, obviously because they didn’t want someone who got bad press to be advertising their wonderful Christmas food, keeping Cocozza in the advert would mean that partying cocaine addicts adopt the Marks & Spencer lifestyle and that would be completely the wrong image for Marks wouldn’t it?
So what happens when attractive or famous people aren’t ideal for advertising a certain product or service? for example beauty products that make you look ten years younger, or medications and vitamin supplements. Well, this is where “research” and mathematical explanations come into play. I’m not going to rant on about this too much, a chap called Ben Goldacre wrote a book called “Bad Science” that has various chapters about how the media use and report research, I do recommend reading it but this is completely beyond my point. What I’m trying to say here is that companies try to make their adverts seem sciency by reporting findings from their research which was actually badly run and it’s even a known fact that skin cream companies have invented chemical names to make it look like their cream has different active ingredients to all other creams out there. If you have more than two brain cells you will realise that active ingredients in all skin moisturisers are the same and if you moisturised everyday for 10 years you would look younger than people who didn’t anyway. You can also get the gist of how bad the research is by actually reading the small print at the bottom of the screen, it will say something like “when comparing all of our nationwide stores to a very small corner shop in Grimbsy” or “50.2% of participants agreed, n=2”. It seems that a sciency type presentation influences people to buy products where health is concerned. As I said, I could write about this particular topic all day but I’ll spare you the detail, it’s merely a rant about advertising not a lesson in scientific method.
This rant has only sparked up because advertising breaks on TV and radio are becoming a lot more frequent, the recent product placement update really doesn’t help either. Free software such as Spotify bombard users with 3 adverts after listening to one or two songs. Companies use social networking websites as a means of advertising when we’re using media that is supposedly alternative. Webpages are plastered with adverts. It just seems difficult to escape corporate advertising. I challenge you to live a normal day but avoid advertisement of any kind … I bet that isn’t even possible.
What I’m trying to say is that it’s rather sad that we live in a society where the majority of us buy products without looking into its actual purpose, quality and features. We assume that products are of good quality because the company’s advertising strategy is powerful, i.e. they get someone who is really attractive and/or famous to advertise them and broadcast their advertisements where people are most likely to see them frequently. I’m the type of person who sees product packaging as an advertisement too, so just remember that it’s what’s inside the packaging that counts.










